« Any cultural theorists out there? I am processing something I don't know much about, and am looking for some insight.... | Main | Questions and thoughts for emergent and traditional churches, and their like-minded adherents, and can we not grow, guide and learn from each other? Here's what I'm wondering....what do you think? »
December 01, 2005
Where I am at right now in regards to the "emerging church", and a good critique by Fuller professor Ray Anderson (his insights are worth reading, so at least skip to the bottom of this post if you want and read him).....
If you have been following my blog for a while, you know that I have been talking quite a bit about the "emerging church" and a lot more recently about Emerging Churches: Creating Christian Community in Postmodern Cultures, of which I'm about 230 pages into.
This book has been very challenging so far, even if I already had my mind made up in certain areas. There are some things that I find myself resonating with, and saying a "yes" to. There are some things that I find myself disagreeing with, and saying a "no" to. And then there are some things that I neither disagree, or agree with, and they just are. Either I have not forumlated my opinion on them, or I don't consider them to be a critical issue of which I have set the views down in stone.
Here is a brief rundown so far of what I have read, and where I come out:
Resonate with:
the "emerging churches'" view of leadership and empowerment; its view of consumerism in Christianity, especially in how it relates to seeker-driven churches; its willingness to allow for space, doubts, questions, etc., within its community; its emphasis on relationality, rather than efficiency, production and numbers; its emphasis on narrative and storytelling, and not just rationalistic, systematic theology........
Disagree with:
some of their views on a "leaderless" church; some of their views that focus primarily on the Gospels exclusively (though I think they are quite good with looking at all of Scripture, and more so than some churches, there is a tendency to only look at the Gospels); some of their animosity, or reluctance for seminary trained leadership (not because you need to be seminary trained, but do they see this as a handicap instead, or not a good thing; and this is probably a bias since I am one of them); what I perceive as a hesitancy to maybe developing or discussing theology, in regards to how it relates to the praxis of "emering churches."
Wrestling with:
how relevant does one need to be to culture? (meaning: what's informing what? is the culture informing the "good news", or vice-versa); what role does a community play in interpretation? (this is not saying anything goes and it's all relative, but what is the function of community in interpretation, in light of the word of God); the role of paid clergy, or the professionalization of clery (of which I am currently)
This is just a write as you go rundown as I am reading this book. Once I finish it, I will have some more time to reflect on what has been said, and how I feel about some of these issues. But for now, the book has succeeded in not allowing me to simply believe I have everything figured out. For some, having everything figured out is a necessity, almost as if winning a Biblical quiz contest allows one to be a part of the right group. But for now, I am conent re-working, wrestling with, and journeying through these things.
One of the most influential figures in my theological development was my Fuller professor, Dr. Ray Anderson whom I have linked on the left column under influential thinkers, etc. He instilled in me my love of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer specifically. And he taught me how to wed theology and ministry together. I had the privilege of reading a working manuscript of his soon to be released book, "Emergent Theology for Emerging Churches" (Intervarsity 2006). It is going to be a great book, and I believe, one of the most informative and important in addressing these issues. But for now, I will post below the comment that he left on Ryan Bolger's Blog regarding some of his concerns on the "emerging church":
Great book Ryan! Congratulations to you and Eddie for your new book, Emerging Churches (Baker). Outstanding piece of sociological research into the emerging church movement. I admire the way that you were able to allow the voices of the persons you interviewed to speak for themselves without intruding your own critical analysis and perspective. This is a must read for all interested in this movement. Having said that, the book, while a good read, begs for response and dialogue. Here goes! The chapter on "Identifying with Jesus" (3) was provocative. I had already been alerted by a reader of my own manuscript on an Emergent Theology for Emerging Churches (InterVarsity, 2006), that my heavy reliance on Paul would not sit well with many in the movement, who preferred Jesus over Paul. In fact one of your participants in the project stated that he had given up on Paul and turned back to Jesus. I guess that Paul has been used to proof text a good bit of systematic theology (e.g. Calvin and Luther!). On the other hand, to turn away from Paul is to turn away from Paul's Christ. The Christ of Paul is the crucified, resurrected, ascended and present Jesus through the power of the Holy Spirit. While Paul certainly had first hand reports of the ministry and teaching of Jesus prior to his death on the cross, the Christ that he met on the Damascus Road had already ascended to heaven and was present now through the Holy Spirit. The church that emerged out of Antioch through Paul had spread throughout his world (including Rome), by the time of his death, not by identifying with the Jesus of the synoptic gospels (which had not yet been written!) but by the power of the crucified and risen Christ through the Holy Spirit. The absence of the cross, resurrection, Pentecost and the eschatological imprint of the coming Christ upon the emerging churches as reported in this research project is stunning, to my mind. I came away with the impression (just an impression!) that for many who are active participants in emerging churches, the cross and resurrection were more of an historical accident than a theological necessity. It is as though Jesus could have fulfilled God's mission in the world through the Kingdom without death and resurrection as a means of overcoming the human dilemma of sin and death. But now I realize that I have introduced theology into the discussion, which, I gather, is to be part of the 'modern world left behind!' -maybe a new series? Fascinating book! Ray Anderson
Posted by: Ray Anderson | November 19, 2005 at 08:44 AM
Posted by rhett at December 1, 2005 03:24 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rhettsmith.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/231
Comments
Rhett- I read your blog because you are so humble in your approach to writing. Thanks for admiting you are trying to figure things out. I've been on a lot of blogs lately of people who think they've got it all figured out. They scare me. You don't. Let's hang soon. We'd love to see you guys down here.
Posted by: Lars Rood at December 1, 2005 05:26 PM
Rhett,
I have been researching and reading quite a bit on the emergent movement. Working with young adults seems to drag us this direction, don't you think? Like you, there are some good issues that are brought up in the emergent movement, but many issues and philosophies can be dangerous ground. I believe whole heartedly that we cannot forgo theology and sound doctrine. My research into the movement finds a fair amount of ideology that does not adhere to sound doctrine and theology, but rather centers around a belief in experiential, feelings, one's own interpretation, etc. We need to be really careful when we see people moving into this direction. Scripture is clear that sound doctrine is essential! May we never forget that. Good posts, brother!
Wade
Posted by: Wade Myers at December 1, 2005 07:26 PM
Lars,
Thanks for the kind words...you were my boss at one point, so I guess you taught me some things :-) Let's hang soon, that would be fun.
Wade,
Good thoughts. I do think that young adults encounter certain issues that may be generational, though I think "emergent churches" would see it less as a generational issue, than an epistemological shift. That I have yet to get a hold of. I do think there is an epistomological shift that has occurred, or has been occurring, but I also believe there are generational issues, or rather, life stage issues that especially attracts young adults to "emergent minded" things.
thanks
rhett
Posted by: Rhett Smith at December 1, 2005 10:44 PM
It would be interesting to apply your hypothesis ("life stage issues that especially attrac young adults to emergent-minded things") to those who were young adults in the 80s, 70s, etc. I have no idea what sort of data might be available to assess epistemelogical shifts, but it's an interesting question.
Posted by: Glenn at December 1, 2005 11:39 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
